Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
A review on statistical and machine learning competing risks methods
Karla Monterrubio-Gómez1, Nathan Constantine-Cooke1,2, Catalina A Vallejos1,3
1MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract:
When modeling competing risks (CR) survival data, several techniques have been proposed in both the statistical and machine learning literature. State-of-the-art methods have extended classical approaches with more flexible assumptions that can improve predictive performance, allow high-dimensional data and missing values, among others. Despite this, modern approaches have not been widely employed in applied settings. This article aims to aid the uptake of such methods by providing a condensed compendium of CR survival methods with a unified notation and interpretation across approaches. We highlight available software and, when possible, demonstrate their usage via reproducible R vignettes. Moreover, we discuss two major concerns that can affect benchmark studies in this context: the choice of performance metrics and reproducibility.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Rate
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

