Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.3K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.3K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

16.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to: An unexpected Australian piece of the palm bug puzzle (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae): natural history, comparative morphology and systematics.

Invertebrate systematics·2026
Same author

An unexpected Australian piece of the palm bug puzzle (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae): natural history, comparative morphology and systematics.

Invertebrate systematics·2025
Same author

Complementary approaches to measure predation pressure on butterfly populations in Australia.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Hiding among the palms: the remarkable discovery of a new palm bug genus and species (Insecta: Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae) from remote Norfolk Island; systematics, natural history, palm specialism and biogeography.

Invertebrate systematics·2025
Same author

A parasitic or mutualistic conundrum: can symbiotic protists increase thermal tolerance in a semi-aquatic insect?

Royal Society open science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
08:15

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.9K

Morphological ant mimics: constrained to imperfection?

Donald James McLean1, Gerasimos Cassis2, Marie E Herberstein1

  • 1School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia.

Biology Letters
|February 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evolutionary constraints do not explain inaccurate mimicry in spiders and insects. Instead, adaptive processes shape imperfect mimicry, highlighting the role of natural selection in evolutionary diversity.

Keywords:
adaptationevolutionary constraintimperfect mimicrymyrmecomorphy

More Related Videos

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

9.8K
Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy
09:16

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy

Published on: January 30, 2014

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
08:15

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.9K
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

9.8K
Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy
09:16

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy

Published on: January 30, 2014

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Animal behavior
  • Speciation

Background:

  • Adaptive evolution depends on heritable variation and natural selection.
  • Evolutionary constraints can limit adaptation, but their role versus adaptation in evolutionary outcomes is debated.
  • Inaccurate mimicry is often attributed to evolutionary constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare body-shape mimicry variation and accuracy in ant-mimicking spiders and insects.
  • To test the hypothesis that greater evolutionary distance in spiders leads to greater constraints and less accurate mimicry.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of body-shape mimicry.
  • Assessing variation and accuracy in ant-mimicking spiders and insects.

Main Results:

  • High inter-species variation in mimetic accuracy was observed.
  • No significant difference in overall mimetic accuracy between spiders and insects was found.
  • Findings contradict the hypothesis that constraints cause inaccurate mimicry.

Conclusions:

  • Imperfect mimicry in spiders and insects is primarily driven by adaptive processes, not constraints or chance.
  • This research contributes to understanding evolutionary diversity and phenotypic outcomes.
  • Natural selection plays a key role in shaping mimicry accuracy.