Related Experiment Videos
Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships
Journal of Homosexuality
|January 1, 1985
Summary
Gender, not sexual preference, significantly impacts relationship satisfaction and commitment. Women reported higher investment and commitment, while relationship costs were more influential for females.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Relationship Science
Background:
- Understanding relationship dynamics is crucial for psychological well-being.
- Rusbult's investment model provides a framework for analyzing relationship maintenance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate determinants of relationship satisfaction and commitment.
- To examine these determinants across gender and sexual orientation groups (homosexual and heterosexual).
Main Methods:
- Utilized Rusbult's investment model (1980, 1983).
- Employed a questionnaire measuring rewards, costs, alternatives, investments, satisfaction, and commitment.
- Assessed male/female homosexual and heterosexual individuals.
Main Results:
- Women (lesbians and heterosexuals) reported higher relationship investment and commitment than men.
- Heterosexual individuals reported higher relationship costs and marginally higher investments.
- Gender was a more significant predictor than sexual preference in relationship satisfaction and commitment.
Conclusions:
- The investment model effectively predicted relationship satisfaction and commitment across all groups.
- Higher satisfaction linked to greater rewards and lower costs.
- Greater commitment associated with higher satisfaction, investments, and poorer alternatives.
- Relationship costs more strongly predicted satisfaction and commitment for women than men.