Mapping the Landscape of Brachial Plexus Birth Injury Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study

Alexandra F Hoffman1, Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani2, Steven M Koehler2

  • 1Orthopedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA.

Cureus
|February 14, 2024
PubMed

Insights

This bibliometric analysis of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) reveals trends in research, authorship, and global collaboration. It highlights the need for continued study to improve treatments and outcomes for affected children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common condition causing significant functional impairments in children.
  • Existing literature on BPBI requires quantitative evaluation to understand research trends and foster future growth.
  • A comprehensive bibliometric analysis is needed to map the landscape of BPBI research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively evaluate the existing literature on brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI).
  • To analyze authorship, collaboration patterns, publication trends, and keyword usage in BPBI research.
  • To inform the medical community and guide future research and clinical practice in BPBI.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of the Web of Science database identified 712 relevant documents published between 1986 and 2022.
  • Bibliometric analysis was performed using Biblioshiny, VOSviewer, and TextRazor for data analysis and keyword categorization.
  • Key metrics including annual growth rate, author productivity, citation counts, and international co-authorship were assessed.

Main Results:

  • The literature on BPBI exhibited an average annual growth rate of 7.94% and an average document age of 12 years.
  • International co-authorship was observed at 9.6%, with the United States leading global collaborations.
  • Prominent authors and journals were identified, and keyword analysis indicated 'society' and 'health' as prevalent research themes.

Conclusions:

  • The bibliometric analysis reveals a dynamic and collaborative research landscape for BPBI.
  • There is a significant need for continued research contributions to address knowledge gaps and enhance global collaboration.
  • This study serves as a resource to guide future research, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and improve outcomes for individuals with BPBI.