Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry: The KODRA Trial

Jun-Won Lee1, Yongcheol Kim2, Bong-Ki Lee3

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.

PubMed

Insights

Distal radial access (DRA) shows high success in coronary angiography and intervention, with low complication rates. Weak pulse and limited operator experience predict puncture failure in this large registry.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Vascular Access Techniques
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Distal radial access (DRA) is an emerging alternative vascular access route.
  • Limited evidence currently exists regarding the safety and efficacy of DRA in routine practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and feasibility of distal radial access (DRA) in daily clinical practice.
  • To assess the success rates of coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using DRA.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, multicenter registry (KODRA trial) involving 4,977 patients across 14 hospitals.
  • Primary endpoints: CAG and PCI success rates. Secondary endpoints: puncture success, crossover rates, access-site complications, bleeding events, and puncture failure predictors.

Main Results:

  • High success rates for CAG (100%) and PCI (98.8%) via DRA.
  • Successful distal radial artery puncture achieved in 94.4% of cases.
  • Low rates of distal radial artery occlusion (0.8%), radial artery occlusion (0.8%), and DRA-related bleeding (3.3%) with no serious hematomas.

Conclusions:

  • Distal radial access (DRA) is safe and effective for coronary procedures, demonstrating high success and low complication rates.
  • Predictors of puncture failure include a weak pulse and less than 100 prior DRA cases for the operator.
Abstract