Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.0K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

973
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
973
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

923
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
923
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.4K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.4K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.0K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.0K
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

1.7K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Comment on "Non-Polaritonic Effects in Cavity-Modified Photochemistry": On the Importance of Experimental Details.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2025
Same author

Multiple interacting photonic modes in strongly coupled organic microcavities.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2024
Same author

Erratum: "Strong coupling-induced frequency shifts of highly detuned photonic modes in multimode cavities" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 204303 (2024)].

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Molecular Strong Coupling and Cavity Finesse.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2024
Same author

Strong coupling in molecular systems: a simple predictor employing routine optical measurements.

Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)·2024
Same author

Strong coupling-induced frequency shifts of highly detuned photonic modes in multimode cavities.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same journal

Data-Driven Exploration of the Polyethylene Catalyst Chemical Space via Machine Learning.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Role of Ultrafast Electron-Thermal-Phonon Interactions in High Harmonic Generation and Dephasing from Graphene.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Real-Time Vibrational Spectroscopy Reveals an Inversion Transition State in the Photoisomerization of Phenylazoimidazole.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Precursor-Directed Self-Assembly in Hydrothermal Carbon Nitride Nanostructures Revealed by Nano-FTIR.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Equation-of-Motion Block-Correlated Coupled Cluster Method for Excited Electronic States of Strongly Correlated Systems".

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Rationalizing Stacking-Dependent Charge Injection Dynamics in Radical-Based Organic Light-Emitting Diodes.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
08:17

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA

Published on: July 9, 2021

4.7K

Selection Bias in Strong Coupling Experiments.

Philip A Thomas1, William L Barnes1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QL, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
|February 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Strong coupling of light and molecules shows promise, but reproducibility and interpretation challenges persist. This work highlights how cognitive bias can affect data analysis in strong coupling experiments.

More Related Videos

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

9.6K
In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx
09:49

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
08:17

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA

Published on: July 9, 2021

4.7K
All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

9.6K
In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx
09:49

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Strong coupling between light and molecules offers novel ways to control material properties.
  • Current research faces challenges in reproducibility and distinguishing strong coupling from other phenomena.
  • A clear theoretical framework for understanding these interactions is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address challenges in the field of strong light-molecule coupling.
  • To investigate how cognitive bias influences the interpretation of experimental data in this area.
  • To provide guidance for more rigorous experimental design and data evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of experimental data interpretation in strong coupling research.
  • Discussion of potential cognitive biases affecting scientific judgment.
  • Review of existing challenges in reproducibility and theoretical modeling.

Main Results:

  • Cognitive bias can lead to overemphasis on specific interpretations of unsystematic data.
  • Lack of clear theoretical models complicates the differentiation of strong coupling effects.
  • Reproducibility issues hinder reliable advancement in the field.

Conclusions:

  • Careful experimental planning is crucial for validating strong coupling claims.
  • Researchers must be aware of cognitive biases when interpreting experimental results.
  • Further development of theoretical models is needed to advance the understanding of strong light-molecule interactions.