Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
Published on: June 18, 2018
The Corbett Targeted Coin Test: Reliability, criterion related validity, and normative data.
Kimatha O Grice1, Gustavo J Almeida2
1Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
The Corbett Targeted Coin Test (CTCT) shows moderate to excellent interrater reliability but poor test-retest reliability for assessing in-hand manipulation. Further research is needed to improve its reliability for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Clinical measurement and assessment of fine motor skills.
- Occupational therapy and rehabilitation.
- Human motor control and dexterity.
Background:
- Daily living tasks frequently require in-hand manipulation (IHM).
- A need exists for standardized assessment tools to measure IHM.
- The Corbett Targeted Coin Test (CTCT) was developed to measure fine motor skills in IHM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interrater, test-retest reliability, and validity of the CTCT.
- To establish adult normative data for the CTCT.
Main Methods:
- Reliability and Validity: 30 participants (21-45 years) were assessed using the CTCT and Nine-Hole Peg Test by three researchers, with CTCT re-evaluation after one week.
- Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,k).
- Normative Data: 190 participants (20-80 years) were assessed using the CTCT, with scores analyzed by age groups and gender.
Main Results:
- Test-retest reliability for the CTCT was poor for the right hand (ICCs = -0.29 to 0.45) and poor-moderate for the left hand (ICCs = 0.17-0.56).
- Interrater reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICCs = 0.60-0.80).
- Agreement between CTCT and Nine-Hole Peg Test scores was poor for both hands (ICCs = 0.02-0.06).
- Normative data indicated highest performance in the 41-50 age group and lowest in the 71-80 age group, with similar scores between genders.
Conclusions:
- The CTCT demonstrates acceptable interrater reliability, suggesting consistent administration by different testers.
- Poor test-retest reliability may be attributed to practice effects, indicating a need for refinement.
- The CTCT measures different constructs than the Nine-Hole Peg Test, suggesting it captures unique aspects of dexterity.
- The CTCT may offer an additional dimension for assessing fine motor skills and IHM but requires further research on test-retest reliability.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
12:08The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
Published on: April 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Cochran's Q Test
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates...
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
Correlations
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test