Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

03:14
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
558
Patients with floaters: Answers from virtual assistants and large language models.
Gloria Wu1, Weichen Zhao2, Adrial Wong2
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Digital Health
|February 16, 2024
Summary
AI chatbots and virtual assistants provide factual information on eye floaters but often miss the urgency of potential retinal detachment. Patients may receive incomplete guidance, delaying necessary medical attention for this common vision issue.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology and Artificial Intelligence
- Digital Health and Patient Information Dissemination
Background:
- Eye floaters are a common visual disturbance affecting a significant portion of the population seeking eye care information.
- The increasing use of AI chatbots and virtual assistants necessitates an evaluation of their accuracy and completeness in providing health information.
- Floaters can be associated with serious conditions like retinal detachment, requiring timely medical intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the information provided by leading AI chatbots (ChatGPT, Bard) and virtual assistants (Google Assistant, Alexa) regarding eye floaters.
- To assess the reading comprehension level and keyword usage of AI responses compared to a reputable source like the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO.org).
Main Methods:
- Utilized the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO.org) 'Floaters and Flashes' section as a reference for four key questions.
- Queried ChatGPT, Bard, Google Assistant, and Alexa with these questions to gather their responses.
- Evaluated responses for factual accuracy, keyword inclusion (e.g., 'ophthalmologist'), and reading comprehension using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula.
Main Results:
- AI responses generally contained factual information but lacked emphasis on the urgency of diagnosing conditions like retinal detachment.
- Google Assistant was the only AI that mentioned 'ophthalmologist'.
- AI-generated content had a higher reading comprehension level (8.1-13.1) compared to AAO.org (7.3 grade) and a higher word count than virtual assistants.
Conclusions:
- While AI tools offer accessible information on floaters, they may omit critical details regarding the urgency of seeking professional medical evaluation.
- There is a risk of 'errors of omission,' potentially leading patients to underestimate the seriousness of floaters and delay seeking care from an ophthalmologist.
- The study highlights the need for AI to convey the potential urgency associated with eye floaters to ensure patient safety and timely diagnosis.
Keywords:
AlexaAmerican Academy of OphthalmologyBardChatGPTGoogle AssistantLLMfloatershealth literacyvirtual assistants
