Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Signal intensity, task context, and auditory-visual interactions.

M Radeau

    Perception
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    N1b and Na subcomponents of the N100 long latency auditory evoked-potential: neurophysiological correlates of voicing in French-speaking subjects.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2009
    Same author

    Mismatch negativity (MMN) evoked by sound duration contrasts: an unexpected major effect of deviance direction on amplitudes.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2008
    Same author

    Generalization of the generation of an MMN by illusory McGurk percepts: voiceless consonants.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2004
    Same author

    Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2002
    Same author

    Electrophysiology of spatial scene analysis: the mismatch negativity (MMN) is sensitive to the ventriloquism illusion.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2002
    Same author

    Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2001
    Same journal

    Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Why do we have two eyes.

    Perception·2026
    See all related articles

    High-intensity signals more strongly influence cross-modal bias between vision and audition. Task context did not affect attentional bias, suggesting instructions alone guide attention effectively.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Sensory processing

    Background:

    • Cross-modal interactions between vision and audition are fundamental to sensory perception.
    • Understanding how signal intensity and task context influence these interactions is crucial for explaining attentional mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of signal intensity on cross-modal bias between vision and audition.
    • To examine the role of task context (unimodal vs. bimodal) and instructions in directing attention during cross-modal tasks.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants performed a pointing task involving visual and auditory signals presented at high or low intensities.
    • Two task contexts were employed: constant (unimodal) and changing (bimodal) signal modalities within sessions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Instructions informed participants about potential signal locations and modalities.

    • Main Results:

    • High-intensity visual signals exerted a stronger biasing effect on auditory perception and were less susceptible to auditory bias compared to low-intensity signals.
    • Auditory signals did not significantly bias visual perception across any intensity conditions.
    • Task context (unimodal vs. bimodal) did not influence the degree of cross-modal bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Signal intensity significantly modulates cross-modal bias, with higher intensity leading to greater influence.
    • Attentional control appears primarily driven by explicit instructions rather than the structure of the task context.
    • These findings offer insights into the interplay of sensory input, attention, and intersensory interactions.