Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

92
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
92
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

100
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sotatercept reduces bone morphogenetic protein signaling in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

RELEAP: reinforcement-enhanced label-efficient active phenotyping for electronic health records.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

Enhancing Team Science by Training Collaborative Biostatisticians to have a Strong Statistical Voice.

Journal of statistical theory and practice·2025
Same author

Implementing response-adaptive randomisation in stratified rare-disease trials: Design challenges and practical solutions.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

StratosPHere 2: statistical analysis plan for a response-adaptive randomised placebo-controlled phase II trial to evaluate hydroxychloroquine and phenylbutyrate in pulmonary arterial hypertension caused by mutations in BMPR2.

Trials·2025
Same author

On the finite-sample and asymptotic error control of a randomization-probability test for response-adaptive clinical trials.

Biometrics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Incorporating participants' welfare into sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.

Xinru Wang1, Nina Deliu2,3, Yusuke Narita4

  • 1Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857, Singapore.

Biometrics
|February 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The new SMART-EXAM trial design improves patient welfare by personalizing treatment assignments. This approach enhances dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) and trial validity compared to conventional methods.

Keywords:
dynamic treatment regimesexperiment-as-marketpreferenceresponse-adaptive designsequential multiple assignment randomized trials

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) guide sequential treatment decisions based on patient conditions.
  • Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) are used to develop optimal DTRs.
  • Conventional SMART designs raise ethical concerns and can impact trial validity due to participant assignment to suboptimal treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the SMART-EXAM framework, a novel SMART design.
  • To improve participant welfare in clinical trials by incorporating patient preferences and predicted treatment effects.
  • To assess the performance of SMART-EXAM in constructing optimal DTRs compared to conventional SMART.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes the SMART-EXAM framework, detailing its implementation steps.
  • It compares the performance of SMART-EXAM against the conventional SMART design.
  • The evaluation includes assessing participant welfare and the ability to construct optimal DTRs.

Main Results:

  • SMART-EXAM demonstrates potential for improving participant welfare within clinical trials.
  • The design shows a desirable ability to construct optimal DTRs when parameters are well-defined.
  • Performance is evaluated against conventional SMART, highlighting improvements in participant-centered outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • SMART-EXAM offers a promising alternative to conventional SMART designs for ethical and effective clinical trials.
  • Incorporating patient preferences into randomization can enhance trial recruitment and validity.
  • The framework has practical applications, illustrated by a trial for ADHD in children.