Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Can we enhance working memory? Bias and effectiveness in cognitive training studies.
Jose A Rodas1,2, Afroditi A Asimakopoulou3, Ciara M Greene3
1Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador. josea.rodasp@gmail.com.
Cognitive training shows small gains in working memory (WM), but these effects are largely due to similar assessment and training tasks. Fluid intelligence is not improved, though specific executive functions may benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human cognition
Background:
- Cognitive training is proposed to enhance cognitive functions like working memory (WM).
- Concerns exist that observed WM improvements may stem from measurement biases, particularly task overlap between training and assessment.
- The efficacy of cognitive training across various cognitive domains requires rigorous evaluation, controlling for potential biases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To meta-analyze the effects of cognitive training on working memory (WM), fluid intelligence, and executive functions.
- To assess the impact of potential biases, such as task similarity, on reported training outcomes.
- To investigate whether training characteristics influence effectiveness and to evaluate study quality.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a meta-analysis of 52 independent studies involving cognitive training targeting diverse cognitive functions.
- Performed a risk of bias assessment for included studies, focusing on randomization and reporting.
- Controlled for practice effects and analyzed data using meta-regressions to explore moderators of training effectiveness.
Main Results:
- Small overall improvements in WM were observed (SMD = 0.18), significantly inflated when assessment tasks were similar to training tasks (SMD = 1.15).
- No significant improvements in fluid intelligence were found, nor was WM improvement linked to fluid intelligence changes.
- Cognitive training demonstrated effectiveness in improving specific executive functions, independent of training dosage or type.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of cognitive training for WM is questionable, with findings potentially driven by measurement bias, specifically task overlap.
- While fluid intelligence remains unaffected, cognitive training may offer benefits for certain executive functions.
- Methodological rigor, including careful task selection and bias assessment, is crucial for accurately evaluating cognitive training efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Information Processing Approach
Language and Cognition
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

