Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.3K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.1K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.1K
Gene Duplication and Divergence02:37

Gene Duplication and Divergence

6.1K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was  generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
6.1K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

22.6K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
22.6K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

58.4K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Equal in death: Ancient genomic analysis of children's early Christian burials.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Genetic diversity of late Neanderthals in northwestern Europe.

Nature·2026
Same author

Regulation of NAT1 activity in modern humans by a novel phosphorylation site.

Science advances·2026
Same author

A high-coverage Neandertal genome from the Altai Mountains reveals population structure among Neandertals.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Ancestral FUT2 genetic adaptation confers resistance to modern norovirus and rotavirus infections.

Current opinion in virology·2026
Same author

Genetic relatedness mattered in the co-burial ritual of Neolithic hunter-gatherers.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources
15:28

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources

Published on: September 3, 2009

20.2K

The genetic changes that shaped Neandertals, Denisovans, and modern humans.

Hugo Zeberg1, Mattias Jakobsson2, Svante Pääbo3

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden.

Cell
|February 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Modern humans survived and thrived over Neandertals and Denisovans due to a combination of genetic features, not a single defining difference. Understanding these ancient human genetic variations is key.

More Related Videos

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

964

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources
15:28

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources

Published on: September 3, 2009

20.2K
Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

964

Area of Science:

  • Paleogenetics
  • Human Evolution
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Modern humans, Neandertals, and Denisovans diverged from a common ancestor approximately 600,000 years ago.
  • These hominin groups coexisted and interbred until around 40,000 years ago.
  • A significant evolutionary question is the reason for the survival and cultural complexity of modern humans compared to other hominins.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the genetic distinctions between modern humans, Neandertals, and Denisovans.
  • To investigate the functional implications of these genetic differences.
  • To propose a nuanced understanding of the genetic underpinnings of modern human identity.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative genomics analysis of ancient and modern human DNA sequences.
  • Functional analysis of identified genetic variations.
  • Literature review on hominin population genetics and evolutionary history.

Main Results:

  • Genetic exchange occurred between modern humans, Neandertals, and Denisovans.
  • Anticipation that future genomic data will reveal minimal genetic differences distinguishing all modern humans from all Neandertals and Denisovans.
  • Identification of specific genetic variations and their potential functional consequences.

Conclusions:

  • The survival and success of modern humans likely stem from a combination of genetic traits rather than a single defining characteristic.
  • The genetic definition of a 'modern human' is likely a mosaic of features, with no single trait present in every individual.
  • Ongoing genomic research continues to refine our understanding of human evolutionary history and population diversity.