Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Anatomic and physiologic classification of adults with congenital heart disease to predict adverse outcomes: Use of
Lindsey C Ivey1, Attila Ahmad2, Joy Chen3
1Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA.
This study shows that using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to classify adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is as effective as chart review for predicting outcomes. This ICD code method is valuable for large-scale ACHD surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Public Health
Background:
- The 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines use an anatomic physiologic (AP) classification for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).
- Existing International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes do not fully capture all conditions within the ACHD AP classification.
- A need exists for an ICD code-based system to approximate the ACHD AP classification for population studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an ICD code-based classification system for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).
- To compare the predictive accuracy of an ICD code-based ACHD classification with traditional medical record review for adverse outcomes.
Main Methods:
- 232 adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) were identified using ICD codes and validated via chart review.
- Individuals were categorized into four modified AP classification groups based on native anatomy and physiology.
- Two classification methods were used: medical record review and ICD/CPT code-based analysis.
- A composite outcome (death, ED visits, hospitalizations) was assessed at least 6 months post-classification.
Main Results:
- 28.4% of participants experienced a composite outcome a median of 1.6 years after their index encounter.
- No significant difference was observed in predicting the composite outcome between the chart review and ICD code-based classification methods.
- Both methods demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy for the composite outcome.
Conclusions:
- Modified AP classification using ICD codes is comparable to chart review in predicting outcomes for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).
- An ICD code-based classification system is a valuable tool for population-based ACHD surveillance using administrative data.
- This approach facilitates large-scale studies on CHD outcomes and management.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications

