Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

186
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
186
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

85
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
85
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.0K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.3K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.3K
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

366
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
366
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

181
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
181

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential expression of monoclonal antibody in rat brain following systemic and local administration of AAV.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2026
Same author

A Bayesian Optimal Interval Design Considering Efficacy and Toxicity in Early Phase Basket Trials.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Engagement is not encoding: Outcome alignment determines the effectiveness of mixed reality in medical education.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Classification of interfacial water governed by water-polymer interactions in hydrated polymers: A molecular dynamics simulation study of ethylene-based and acrylate polymers.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

A Concordance Study between Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Disease Activity in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Dermatology practical & conceptual·2026
Same author

Patient-reported outcome data from a randomized phase II study (STARLIGHT) of fezolinetant in women in Japan with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K

A basket trial design based on constrained hierarchical Bayesian model for latent subgroups.

Kentaro Takeda1, Atsuki Hashimoto2, Shufang Liu3

  • 1Data Science, Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc, Northbrook, Illinois, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|February 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a simplified Bayesian model for basket trials, improving efficiency by grouping cancer types. The new approach enhances statistical power and controls error rates, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
Basket trialsconstrained hierarchical bayesian modelheterogeneitylatent subgrouponcology

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Basket trials offer efficient drug evaluation across multiple cancer types.
  • Heterogeneity in treatment effects across cancer types can violate assumptions in standard basket trial designs.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address the variability of treatment effects within different cancer types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel statistical approach for basket trials that accommodates heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • To improve the efficiency and statistical power of clinical trials involving multiple cancer types.
  • To address the limitations of the exchangeability assumption in existing basket trial models.

Main Methods:

  • Simplified constrained hierarchical Bayesian model for latent subgroups (CHBM-LS) using two classifiers.
  • Latent subgroup modeling to aggregate distinct cancer type baskets.
  • Information borrowing within identified latent subgroups to enhance statistical power.

Main Results:

  • The simplified CHBM-LS approach demonstrated superior performance in real-world basket trial data compared to existing methods.
  • Simulation studies confirmed the CHBM-LS approach yields higher statistical power.
  • The model effectively controlled Type I error rates across various simulated scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The simplified CHBM-LS model provides a robust and efficient framework for analyzing basket trials with heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • This approach offers improved statistical power and reliability for oncology clinical trials.
  • The latent subgroup modeling effectively handles variability, making it a valuable tool for future trial designs.