Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Recording Brain Activity with Ear-Electroencephalography
Published on: March 31, 2023
Resting-state EEG recorded with gel-based vs. consumer dry electrodes: spectral characteristics and across-device
Daria Kleeva1,2,3, Ivan Ninenko2, Mikhail A Lebedev4,5
1Vladimir Zelman Center for Neurobiology and Brain Rehabilitation, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Introduction:
Recordings of electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythms and their analyses have been instrumental in basic neuroscience, clinical diagnostics, and the field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). While in the past such measurements have been conducted mostly in laboratory settings, recent advancements in dry electrode technology pave way to a broader range of consumer and medical application because of their greater convenience compared to gel-based electrodes.
Methods:
Here we conducted resting-state EEG recordings in two groups of healthy participants using three dry-electrode devices, the PSBD Headband, the PSBD Headphones and the Muse Headband, and one standard gel electrode-based system, the NVX. We examined signal quality for various spatial and spectral ranges which are essential for cognitive monitoring and consumer applications.
Results:
Distinctive characteristics of signal quality were found, with the PSBD Headband showing sensitivity in low-frequency ranges and replicating the modulations of delta, theta and alpha power corresponding to the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, and the NVX system performing well in capturing high-frequency oscillations. The PSBD Headphones were more prone to low-frequency artifacts compared to the PSBD Headband, yet recorded modulations in the alpha power and had a strong alignment with the NVX at the higher EEG frequencies. The Muse Headband had several limitations in signal quality.
Discussion:
We suggest that while dry-electrode technology appears to be appropriate for the EEG rhythm-based applications, the potential benefits of these technologies in terms of ease of use and accessibility should be carefully weighed against the capacity of each given system.

