Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Barriers and Facilitators to End-of-Life Care Delivery in ICUs: A Qualitative Study
Lauren M Janczewski1,2, Adithya Chandrasekaran1,2,3,4,5,6, Egide Abahuje1,2
1Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Objectives:
To understand frontline ICU clinician's perceptions of end-of-life care delivery in the ICU.
Design:
Qualitative observational cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Seven ICUs across three hospitals in an integrated academic health system.
Subjects:
ICU clinicians (physicians [critical care, palliative care], advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, chaplains).
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
In total, 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. The research team reviewed all transcripts inductively to develop a codebook. Thematic analysis was conducted through coding, category formulation, and sorting for data reduction to identify central themes. Deductive reasoning facilitated data category formulation and thematic structuring anchored on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model identified that work systems (people, environment, tools, tasks) lead to processes and outcomes. Four themes were barriers or facilitators to end-of-life care. First, work system barriers delayed end-of-life care communication among clinicians as well as between clinicians and families. For example, over-reliance on palliative care people in handling end-of-life discussions prevented timely end-of-life care discussions with families. Second, clinician-level variability existed in end-of-life communication tasks. For example, end-of-life care discussions varied greatly in process and outcomes depending on the clinician leading the conversation. Third, clinician-family-patient priorities or treatment goals were misaligned. Conversely, regular discussion and joint decisions facilitated higher familial confidence in end-of-life care delivery process. These detailed discussions between care teams aligned priorities and led to fewer situations where patients/families received conflicting information. Fourth, clinician moral distress occurred from providing nonbeneficial care. Interviewees reported standardized end-of-life care discussion process incorporated by the people in the work system including patient, family, and clinicians were foundational to delivering end-of-life care that reduced both patient and family suffering, as well as clinician moral distress.
Conclusions:
Standardized work system communication tasks may improve end-of life discussion processes between clinicians and families.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Continuing Care
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

