Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Postoperative Sensitivity after Class II Restoration with Bulk-Fill vs Conventional
J Twigg1,2, N Vaid3, A Chavda4
1NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bulk-fill composite restorations show no difference in post-operative sensitivity compared to conventional layered composites for class II cavities. This finding supports bulk-fill materials as a viable alternative for posterior dental restorations, simplifying the procedure without compromising patient comfort.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Bulk-fill composites offer potential advantages in simplifying posterior restorations, reducing chair time and technical demands.
- Post-operative sensitivity is a common concern with posterior composite restorations; bulk-fill materials may offer a solution.
- This study investigated post-operative sensitivity in class II carious lesions restored with bulk-fill versus conventional layered composites.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare post-operative sensitivity between bulk-fill and conventional layered composite materials for class II posterior restorations.
- To evaluate if bulk-fill composites can mitigate post-operative sensitivity risks associated with posterior restorations.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
- Participants with class II carious lesions were randomized to receive either bulk-fill (Coltene Fill-UpTM) or conventional layered (Coltene Brilliant Everglow) composite restorations.
- The primary outcome measured was post-operative sensitivity at 24 hours.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in post-operative sensitivity was observed between the bulk-fill and conventional composite groups at 24 hours or any other time point.
- Participant age and baseline sensitivity scores were significant factors influencing post-operative sensitivity.
- One restoration debonded in the bulk-fill group; no other adverse effects were reported. Placement time was similar for both groups.
Conclusions:
- Bulk-fill composite restorations demonstrated comparable post-operative sensitivity to conventional, incrementally cured composites for class II posterior restorations.
- The findings suggest that bulk-fill composites are a viable alternative for posterior restorations, offering similar clinical outcomes regarding sensitivity.
- Further research may explore long-term durability and other clinical performance aspects of bulk-fill materials.
More Related Videos
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Experimental Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs