Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

Vision

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fluctuating internal states mediate neural-behavioral covariations in V1.

Nature neuroscience·2026

Same author

Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Relating natural image statistics to patterns of response covariability in macaque primary visual cortex.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Sensory population activity reveals downstream confidence computations in the primate visual system.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Stabilized Supralinear Network Model of Responses to Surround Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex.

eNeuro·2025

Same author

Bayesian inference by visuomotor neurons in the prefrontal cortex.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same journal

Brain-spleen axis regulates learned fear.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Acetylcholine: a candidate substrate for hippocampal predictive learning?

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Astrocytes viewed through the lens of their proteomes and subproteomes.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

m<sup>6</sup>A in RNA: a key regulator of brain development, function and disease.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Non-invasive deep-brain neuromodulation by transcranial radio frequency stimulation.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Heading into the wild: setting the course to natural neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Response sub-additivity and variability quenching in visual cortex.

Robbe L T Goris¹, Ruben Coen-Cagli^2,3,4, Kenneth D Miller^5,6,7,8,9

¹Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Robbe.Goris@utexas.edu.

Nature Reviews. Neuroscience

|February 20, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Sub-additivity and variability quenching in the primary visual cortex (V1) are linked phenomena. These response motifs, crucial for visual processing, may share common origins and appear across cortical areas.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Electrophysiological Investigations of Retinogeniculate and Corticogeniculate Synapse Function

Electrophysiological Investigations of Retinogeniculate and Corticogeniculate Synapse Function

Published on: August 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Electrophysiological Investigations of Retinogeniculate and Corticogeniculate Synapse Function

Electrophysiological Investigations of Retinogeniculate and Corticogeniculate Synapse Function

Published on: August 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Visual Neuroscience

Background:

Sub-additivity and variability are common response patterns in the primary visual cortex (V1).
Sub-additivity aids visual interpretation, while variability limits processing precision.
Emerging evidence suggests these phenomena are often inversely related.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the link between response sub-additivity and variability quenching in V1.
To explore potential common origins and circuit mechanisms.
To assess the generalizability of these motifs to other cortical areas.

Main Methods:

Overview of empirical findings in V1.
Discussion of recent model-based insights.
Analysis of functional operations, computational objectives, and circuit mechanisms.

Main Results:

Sub-additivity and variability quenching frequently co-occur.
Modeling approaches predict the co-occurrence of these motifs.
The observed relationship extends beyond V1 to other cortical regions.

Conclusions:

Response sub-additivity and variability quenching may stem from common origins.
This connection represents a potentially canonical motif across the cortex.
Understanding these motifs enhances our knowledge of neural processing and cortical function.