A systematic review of the operative techniques for treating cubitus varus deformity in children

Brett Hoffman1, Anderson Lee, Dominique DiGiacomo

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

Insights

This review compares surgical methods for cubitus varus in children. Three-dimensional osteotomy offers the best outcomes with no infections, while lateral closing wedge osteotomy is common but has higher revision rates.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Cubitus varus deformity in children requires effective surgical correction.
  • Various operative techniques exist, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare operative techniques for treating pediatric cubitus varus.
  • To evaluate outcomes including angular correction, complications, revisions, and patient-reported scores.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases.
  • Inclusion of 45 papers involving 911 pediatric patients.
  • Analysis of data on lateral closing wedge osteotomy, step-cut osteotomy, distraction osteogenesis, dome osteotomy, and 3D osteotomy.

Main Results:

  • Lateral closing wedge osteotomy (LCWO) was most common (427 patients) with a 3% revision rate.
  • Step-cut osteotomy showed no infections or loss of motion.
  • Distraction osteogenesis had high excellent results (88.04%) but 18% superficial infections.
  • 3D osteotomy had no infections and the lowest poor outcomes (2.22%).

Conclusions:

  • For unidimensional correction, LCWO is simple, while step-cut osteotomy reduces prominence but is more complex.
  • Distraction osteogenesis is minimally invasive but has higher infection rates.
  • 3D osteotomy is superior to dome osteotomy for multidimensional correction due to lower infection and higher excellent outcome rates.