Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

07:40
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
3.3K
Naive skepticism scale: development and validation tests applied to the chilean population.
Rodrigo Ferrer-Urbina1, Yasna Ramírez1, Patricio Mena-Chamorro1
1Escuela de Psicología y Filosofía, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile.
Summary
A new scale effectively measures naive skepticism in adults. This tool helps assess susceptibility to misinformation and its impact on public health attitudes.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Science
Background:
- Skepticism is linked to critical thinking, but naive skepticism may increase misinformation susceptibility.
- Existing skepticism scales are limited in scope, necessitating new assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a scale for measuring naive skepticism in adults.
Main Methods:
- The study involved 446 adults, with data from pilot and validity-testing phases.
- Psychometric analyses included exploratory structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis.
- Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega.
Main Results:
- The naive skepticism scale demonstrated good reliability (ω > 0.8) and validity.
- The scale showed gender invariance and a moderate inverse association with positive COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.
- Internal structure validity was supported by CFI=0.966, TLI=0.951, and RMSEA=0.079.
Conclusions:
- The developed naive skepticism scale possesses acceptable psychometric properties for adult populations.
- This scale enables the assessment of naive skepticism and its implications for understanding misinformation.
- Further research should explore the scale's limitations and theoretical applications.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Humanistic Psychology
1.1K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
1.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Observational Studies
8.6K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.6K

