Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease Based on an Ancestrally Diverse Genome-Wide
Johanna L Smith1, Catherine Tcheandjieu2,3,4, Ozan Dikilitas1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.L.S., O.D., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary heart disease (CHD) show improved performance across diverse populations. Further research with larger, underrepresented datasets is needed to enhance PRS accuracy for all ancestries.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Genomic Medicine
- Population Health
Background:
- Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary heart disease (CHD) exhibit variable predictive performance across different global populations.
- Developing equitable PRS for clinical use necessitates accounting for genetic ancestry variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry PRS for coronary heart disease (CHD).
- To compare the predictive performance of different PRS methodologies across diverse genetic ancestry groups.
Main Methods:
- Derived ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry PRS for CHD using pruning and thresholding (PRSPT) and continuous shrinkage priors (PRSCSx).
- Utilized summary statistics from a large multi-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis (1.1 million participants).
- Trained and optimized PRS in the Million Veteran Program, then validated in 9 diverse cohorts (176,988 individuals).
Main Results:
- Multi-ancestry PRSPT and PRSCSx consistently outperformed ancestry-specific PRS across various tuning parameters.
- The best-performing multi-ancestry PRS (PRSPTmult and PRSCSxmult) showed significant CHD associations across South Asian, European, East Asian, Hispanic/Latino, and African ancestries.
- PRSPTmult demonstrated the strongest CHD association in South Asian and European ancestry individuals.
Conclusions:
- Leveraging multi-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis summary statistics enhances PRSCHD performance in most populations compared to single-ancestry methods.
- Predictive performance improvements were limited in individuals of African ancestry, underscoring the need for larger, diverse genomic datasets.
- Increased representation in genome-wide association studies is crucial for improving PRSCHD equity and accuracy across all populations.
More Related Videos
08:27Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Heritability
Pleiotropy