Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Monovalent Cation Doping of CH3NH3PbI3 for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells
Published on: March 19, 2017
Structure and Charge Carrier Separation Promotion Effects of Antiphase Boundaries in Cesium Lead Bromide
Kepeng Song1,2, Yingcai Fan3, Wei Qin3
1Electron Microscopy Center, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Abstract:
Defects in lead halide perovskites (LHPs) may have a significant impact on charge carrier separation, but the roles of the defects are not fully understood. Here, using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), different types of antiphase boundaries (APBs) are discovered in CsPbBr3 platelets. APBs with a displacement vector of 1/4[111] are characterized by double layers of CsBr layers at the (110) or (001) planes, while APBs at the (112) planes are formed through edge sharing of PbBr6 ̵octahedra. Significant lattice distortions are determined at (001) and (110) APBs on the basis of quantitative analyses of STEM images. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate that all three types of APBs can induce band offsets at their valence bands and conduction bands. The APBs are intended to promote the separation of photogenerated charge carriers in LHPs. These findings provide a crystal engineering technique for enhancing the optoelectronic properties of LHPs by controlling defects.
Related Concept Videos
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
The Born-Haber Cycle
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

