Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

05:52
Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
21.9K
The SEE-IT Trial: emergency medical services Streaming Enabled Evaluation In Trauma: a feasibility randomised
Cath Taylor1, Lucie Ollis2, Richard M Lyon2,3
1School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK. cath.taylor@surrey.ac.uk.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
|February 21, 2024
Summary
Bystander video livestreaming to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is feasible and acceptable, potentially improving dispatch decisions. Further research is needed to assess benefits and harms.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medical Services
- Health Technology Assessment
- Pre-hospital Care
Background:
- Bystander video livestreaming from the scene to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is increasingly used to aid resource decision-making.
- Potential benefits include earlier, more appropriate dispatch and clinical/financial gains, but evidence remains limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing bystander video livestreaming during trauma incidents.
- To evaluate its potential impact on dispatch decision-making and resource allocation.
- To explore potential benefits and harms associated with this technology.
Main Methods:
- A feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted over six weeks, randomizing shifts 1:1 to video livestreaming (using GoodSAM Instant-On-Scene) or standard care.
- Progression criteria included caller agreement to livestream, footage viewing rates, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) stand-down rates, and absence of psychological harm.
- Observational sub-studies explored acceptability in a diverse population and staff wellbeing.
Main Results:
- Two of four progression criteria were met: 86% of callers agreed to livestream, and 85% of requests resulted in footage.
- Livestreaming was successful in 53 incidents; HEMS stand-down rate reduction was 33% (indeterminate due to data).
- Patient and caller recruitment for harm assessment was low; no evidence of psychological harm was found, but data was insufficient for confidence.
Conclusions:
- Bystander video livestreaming is feasible to implement and acceptable to callers and dispatchers.
- The technology shows potential to aid dispatch decision-making in pre-hospital care.
- Further assessment of unintended consequences, benefits, and harms is warranted before widespread adoption.

