Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)01:27

Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)

3.2K
α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl compounds with two electrophilic sites, the carbonyl carbon, and the β carbon, are susceptible to nucleophilic attack via two modes: conjugate or 1,4-addition and direct or 1,2-addition.
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
3.2K
Cycloaddition Reactions: Overview01:16

Cycloaddition Reactions: Overview

2.6K
Cycloadditions are one of the most valuable and effective synthesis routes to form cyclic compounds. These are concerted pericyclic reactions between two unsaturated compounds resulting in a cyclic product with two new σ bonds formed at the expense of π bonds. The [4 + 2] cycloaddition, known as the Diels–Alder reaction, is the most common. The other example is a [2 + 2] cycloaddition.
2.6K
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification01:14

Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification

371
When drugs are administered, they can elicit either an agonist or antagonist effect on the body. Agonism occurs when a drug activates a specific receptor, triggering a biological response. On the other hand, antagonism happens when a drug binds to the same receptors but blocks their activation, thereby preventing a biological response.
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
371
Cycloaddition Reactions: MO Requirements for Thermal Activation01:16

Cycloaddition Reactions: MO Requirements for Thermal Activation

3.6K
Thermal cycloadditions are reactions where the source of activation energy needed to initiate the reaction is provided in the form of heat. A typical example of a thermally-allowed cycloaddition is the Diels–Alder reaction, which is a [4 + 2] cycloaddition. In contrast, a [2 + 2] cycloaddition is thermally forbidden.
3.6K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.3K
2.3K
Conjugate Addition to α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds01:09

Conjugate Addition to α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds

4.2K
α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl compounds are molecules bearing a carbonyl and alkene functionality in conjugation with each other. The conjugation in the molecule leads to three resonance structures. The hybrid form exhibits two probable electrophilic sites: the carbonyl carbon and the β carbon.
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adverse reactions to the use of large language models in social interactions.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

The cover of randomness: validating implicit methods for the study of sensitive topics.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

How culture shapes choices related to fertility and mortality: Causal evidence at the Swiss language border.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same author

Isolating a culture of son preference among Armenian, Georgian and Azeri Parents in Soviet-era Russia.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same author

Identifying culture as cause: Challenges and opportunities.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same journal

Six ways to put the public at the heart of science and policy.

Nature·2026
Same journal

The complex truth about trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Have people stopped trusting science? The data tell a surprising story.

Nature·2026
Same journal

How FAIR data are helping to build trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Scientists should recognize their own political biases to build public trust.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Diagonal Method to Measure Synergy Among Any Number of Drugs
12:08

Diagonal Method to Measure Synergy Among Any Number of Drugs

Published on: June 21, 2018

18.6K

Super-additive cooperation.

Charles Efferson1, Helen Bernhard2, Urs Fischbacher3,4

  • 1Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. charles.efferson@unil.ch.

Nature
|February 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neither repeated interactions nor intergroup competition reliably explain human cooperation alone. Combining both mechanisms, however, creates powerful synergies, suggesting social motives evolved under their joint influence.

More Related Videos

High-throughput Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations by the Overlap2 Method
07:51

High-throughput Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations by the Overlap2 Method

Published on: May 21, 2018

11.8K
The Multifaceted Benefits of Protein Co-expression in Escherichia coli
12:48

The Multifaceted Benefits of Protein Co-expression in Escherichia coli

Published on: February 5, 2015

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Diagonal Method to Measure Synergy Among Any Number of Drugs
12:08

Diagonal Method to Measure Synergy Among Any Number of Drugs

Published on: June 21, 2018

18.6K
High-throughput Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations by the Overlap2 Method
07:51

High-throughput Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations by the Overlap2 Method

Published on: May 21, 2018

11.8K
The Multifaceted Benefits of Protein Co-expression in Escherichia coli
12:48

The Multifaceted Benefits of Protein Co-expression in Escherichia coli

Published on: February 5, 2015

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral economics
  • Social psychology

Background:

  • Traditional evolutionary models explain cooperation via repeated interactions or intergroup competition.
  • These established mechanisms, however, face theoretical and empirical challenges in fully accounting for cooperative behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolutionary underpinnings of human cooperation.
  • To test the efficacy of repeated interactions and intergroup competition, individually and in combination, in supporting cooperation.
  • To examine the role of ambiguous reciprocity in undermining cooperation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of evolutionary game theory models.
  • Conducting a behavioral experiment in Papua New Guinea.
  • Analyzing strategies involving reciprocal altruism and intergroup dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Neither repeated interactions nor intergroup competition alone reliably sustain cooperation.
  • Ambiguous reciprocity strategies undermine cooperation in repeated interaction models.
  • Intergroup competition is limited by rapid group homogenization, reducing scope for group selection.
  • A combination of repeated interactions and intergroup competition demonstrates synergistic effects, constraining ambiguous reciprocity.
  • Behavioral experiment results align with strategies favoring ingroup cooperation and outgroup defection.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the sufficiency of isolated repeated interactions or intergroup competition as sole drivers of cooperation.
  • Cooperation likely evolved under the combined influence of both repeated interactions and intergroup competition.
  • Social motives for cooperation are shaped by the interplay between within-group and between-group dynamics.