Effectiveness and Safety of Left Distal Transradial Access in Coronary Procedures in the Caribbean

Naveen A Seecheran1, Abel Y Leyva Quert2, Valmiki K Seecheran3

  • 1Clinical Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO.

Cureus
|February 22, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Left distal transradial access (LDTRA) is a safe and effective approach for coronary angiography and intervention, offering shorter procedure and hemostasis times compared to standard left transradial access (LTRA). This method is particularly beneficial in resource-limited settings.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Vascular Access
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease remains a significant health concern globally and in the Caribbean.
  • Transradial access is a preferred method for coronary angiography and intervention due to its safety profile.
  • Left distal transradial access (LDTRA) is an emerging technique with potential benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LDTRA compared to standard left transradial access (LTRA).
  • To assess procedural outcomes, including technical success, duration, and complications, in patients undergoing coronary procedures.
  • To determine the clinical utility of LDTRA in a Caribbean healthcare setting.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study involving 111 patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Patients were divided into two groups: LDTRA (n=88) and LTRA (n=23).
  • Data collected included procedural success, fluoroscopy time, procedural duration, hemostasis time, and vascular complications like radial artery occlusion (RAO).

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in technical success rates between LDTRA (90.9%) and LTRA (100%), p=0.202.
  • LDTRA demonstrated significantly shorter fluoroscopy times (p=0.02), procedural duration (p=0.04), and hemostasis time (p<0.05).
  • No significant difference in procedural complications (8% vs. 4.3%, p=0.476) or reported cases of RAO.

Conclusions:

  • LDTRA is an effective and safe alternative for coronary procedures, comparable to LTRA.
  • LDTRA offers advantages in reduced procedure and hemostasis times, potentially improving patient throughput.
  • The findings suggest LDTRA is clinically relevant for cardiovascular interventions in resource-limited environments like the Caribbean.
Abstract