Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Effectiveness and Safety of Left Distal Transradial Access in Coronary Procedures in the Caribbean
Naveen A Seecheran1, Abel Y Leyva Quert2, Valmiki K Seecheran3
1Clinical Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO.
Insights
Left distal transradial access (LDTRA) is a safe and effective approach for coronary angiography and intervention, offering shorter procedure and hemostasis times compared to standard left transradial access (LTRA). This method is particularly beneficial in resource-limited settings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Access
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease remains a significant health concern globally and in the Caribbean.
- Transradial access is a preferred method for coronary angiography and intervention due to its safety profile.
- Left distal transradial access (LDTRA) is an emerging technique with potential benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LDTRA compared to standard left transradial access (LTRA).
- To assess procedural outcomes, including technical success, duration, and complications, in patients undergoing coronary procedures.
- To determine the clinical utility of LDTRA in a Caribbean healthcare setting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study involving 111 patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Patients were divided into two groups: LDTRA (n=88) and LTRA (n=23).
- Data collected included procedural success, fluoroscopy time, procedural duration, hemostasis time, and vascular complications like radial artery occlusion (RAO).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in technical success rates between LDTRA (90.9%) and LTRA (100%), p=0.202.
- LDTRA demonstrated significantly shorter fluoroscopy times (p=0.02), procedural duration (p=0.04), and hemostasis time (p<0.05).
- No significant difference in procedural complications (8% vs. 4.3%, p=0.476) or reported cases of RAO.
Conclusions:
- LDTRA is an effective and safe alternative for coronary procedures, comparable to LTRA.
- LDTRA offers advantages in reduced procedure and hemostasis times, potentially improving patient throughput.
- The findings suggest LDTRA is clinically relevant for cardiovascular interventions in resource-limited environments like the Caribbean.
Introduction:
This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness and safety of left distal transradial access (LDTRA) in patients with cardiovascular disease in Trinidad undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Method:
Procedural parameters, including technical success and safety outcomes such as vascular complications and radial artery occlusion (RAO), were assessed in 111 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI from January 2023 to June 2023 at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Trinidad and Tobago. Eighty-eight patients underwent LDTRA, while 23 received left transradial access (LTRA).
Results:
There was no difference in procedural success with LDTRA compared to LTRA, 90.9% vs. 100%, p-value 0.202, non-significant (ns). LDTRA was associated with shorter fluoroscopy times (8.4 ± 6.8 minutes vs. 12.4 ± 7.7 minutes, p-value = 0.02), procedural duration (26.7 ± 18 minutes vs. 35.8 ± 20 minutes, p-value = 0.04), and hemostasis time (142 ± 41 minutes vs. 186 ± 44 minutes, p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in procedural-related complications (8% for LDTRA vs. 4.3% for LTRA, p-value = 0.476, ns). There were no reported cases of RAO. In the subgroup of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the fluoroscopy and procedure times were similar for both access sites; however, LDTRA was associated with a shorter hemostasis time (128 ± 30 minutes vs. 194 ± 39 minutes, p-value = 0.01).
Conclusions:
LDTRA is effective and safe for coronary procedures and is associated with a shorter hemostasis time. This study may prove clinically pertinent in a limited-resource Caribbean setting.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
07:30Creating Radio-cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula in the Forearm with a Modified No-Touch Technique
Published on: April 1, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation