Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Offloading Adherence for Appearance's Sake?

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026

Same author

Patient-reported outcomes after dorsal approach plantar plate repair with nine year follow up.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2026

Same author

Outpatient surgical fixation of complicated calcaneal fractures pose no excess risk for 30-day complications.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2024

Same author

Patient expectations in hallux valgus surgery: A qualitative analysis.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2024

Same author

Obesity is highly associated with a non-home discharge following total ankle arthroplasty.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2024

Same author

A Primer on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

Prospective Surgical Cohort Analysis.

Adam E Fleischer¹, Rachel H Albright²

¹Podiatric Medicine & Surgery Residency Program, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center/RFUMS, Chicago, IL, USA; Weil Foot & Ankle Institute, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Podiatric Medicine & Surgery, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science (RFUMS), 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.

Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery

|February 22, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This article offers tools for critically appraising prospective cohort studies, a powerful research design in surgery. A 3-step approach focusing on generalizability, results, and validity is recommended for evaluating surgical practice changes.

Keywords:

Appraisal Bias Chance Confounding Evidence-based medicine Foot Journal club Podiatry

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Surgical Research Methodology
Clinical Study Appraisal

Background:

Prospective cohort studies significantly influence surgical practice.
Critical appraisal skills are essential for evaluating the impact of these studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide tools for critically appraising prospective cohort studies.
To introduce a 3-step approach for evaluating study generalizability, results, and validity.

Main Methods:

The article outlines a structured 3-step critical appraisal process.
It emphasizes understanding generalizability, results, and validity.

Main Results:

The proposed 3-step approach aids in evaluating the quality and applicability of prospective cohort studies.
This method is demonstrated through practical application in journal club sessions.

Conclusions:

Effective critical appraisal of prospective cohort studies is crucial for advancing surgical practice.
The 3-step approach offers a systematic framework for evaluating research validity and impact.