Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Audiological results with two single channel cochlear implants.

R S Tyler, B J Gantz, B F McCabe

    The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Some applications of mathematics in golf.

    Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2017
    Same author

    Recent Advances in Tinnitus.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Cochlear Implants and the Deaf Culture.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Response to Pool and Rose.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    RE: Pugsley et al. (1993). Changes in hearing sensitivity following portable stereo system use. AJA, 2(3), 64-67.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

    Neuroscience·2013
    Same journal

    Laryngeal Injuries Following General Endotracheal Anesthesia: A Case Series.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical and Voice Outcome Differences in Vocal Cord Cysts with and Without Sulcus Vocalis: Insights From a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Bioabsorbable Stenting in a Case of Severe Pediatric Posterior Glottic Stenosis.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin Otic Suspension, 0.3% for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: Results from two Phase III Randomized Clinical Studies.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation Of the Expression Levels Of SerpinB3/B4/B10, Interleukin-17 As Biomarkers For Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Correlation of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Rhinogram Features Beyond Simple Airway Resistance.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    See all related articles

    Patients with single-channel cochlear implants (CIs) can distinguish everyday sounds and speech elements. However, some auditory challenges persist, though audiovisual input can improve performance.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Neuroscience
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Single-channel cochlear implants (CIs) offer auditory restoration for severe to profound hearing loss.
    • Assessing the capabilities and limitations of current CI technology is crucial for patient management and device development.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the auditory and audiovisual speech perception abilities of patients with single-channel cochlear implants.
    • To identify specific areas of difficulty and potential benefits of combined auditory-visual information.

    Main Methods:

    • Six patients with single-channel CIs underwent testing using the Minimal Auditory Capabilities battery and Iowa Cochlear Implant Tests.
    • Auditory-only and audiovisual conditions were assessed, including sound discrimination, syllable counting, speaker sex identification, and sentence perception.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • All patients could discriminate everyday sounds and syllable counts. Speaker sex identification was reliable for five patients.
    • Difficulties were noted in discriminating modulated noise from voice, question from statement, and identifying accented words.
    • Audiovisual testing revealed performance improvements in the sound plus vision condition over vision-only, particularly for sentence-level tasks, though this varied among patients.

    Conclusions:

    • Single-channel CIs enable basic sound discrimination and some speech element identification.
    • Challenges remain in complex auditory discrimination and speech processing, highlighting areas for future research and implant development.
    • Audiovisual integration offers benefits, suggesting its importance in auditory rehabilitation for CI users.