Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

186
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
186
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

247
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
247
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

131
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
131
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large Language Models for World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Drug-Adverse Event Causality Assessment Using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Cases: Comparative Performance Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Theoretical Framework and Key Considerations for Time-to-Onset Analysis in Spontaneous Reporting Systems.

Drug safety·2026
Same author

Prioritization of adverse events related to integrase inhibitors and NNRTIs: a disproportionality analysis using data from the FAERS database.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2026
Same author

A Consideration of Exploratory Approaches to Comedications Associated With Immune-Related Adverse Events during Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

Analysis of acute pancreatitis caused by multi-acting receptor-targeted antipsychotics using the Japanese claims database.

Journal of affective disorders·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor in response to: "Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database".

Expert opinion on drug safety·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.6K

Detection Algorithms for Simple Two-Group Comparisons Using Spontaneous Reporting Systems.

Yoshihiro Noguchi1, Tomoaki Yoshimura2

  • 1Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4, Daigakunishi, Gifu, 501-1196, Japan. noguchiy@gifu-pu.ac.jp.

Drug Safety
|February 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical science historically used adult males as a standard, overlooking sex and age differences in drug safety. This review explores data mining for detecting adverse event (AE) signals specific to children, the elderly, and sex-specific populations.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.6K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Drug Safety
  • Data Mining

Background:

  • Medical research historically defaulted to adult males as the standard for disease pathology, diagnosis, and treatment.
  • Emerging evidence highlights significant sex-based differences in disease risk factors and drug efficacy.
  • Varying metabolic functions in pediatric and geriatric populations limit the direct applicability of clinical trial data from adult males.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current data mining methodologies for detecting drug-related adverse event (AE) signals.
  • To address the lack of systematic literature on identifying AE signals specific to pediatric, geriatric, and sex-specific populations.
  • To evaluate traditional and novel data mining approaches for AE signal detection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on data mining techniques for pharmacovigilance.
  • Analysis of spontaneous reporting systems for drug safety assessment.
  • Exploration of disproportionality algorithms for AE signal detection.

Main Results:

  • Spontaneous reporting systems are crucial for reflecting real-world drug use but have limitations in capturing total patient numbers.
  • Existing AE signal detection algorithms often fail to identify signals specific to pediatric, geriatric, or sex-specific groups.
  • A systematic approach to detecting these specific AE signals is currently lacking.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need for improved data mining strategies to detect sex- and age-specific adverse drug events.
  • Current methods for AE signal detection require enhancement to account for population-specific differences.
  • Further research into specialized data mining techniques is essential for comprehensive drug safety assessment.