7 Tesla MRI Liver Fat Quantification in Mice: Data Quality Assessment

Stefan Polei1, Tobias Lindner2, Kerstin Abshagen3

  • 1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Current Medical Imaging
|February 23, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study introduces a method to assess the reliability of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements from MRI and MRS. Spatially resolved error maps improve the accuracy of PDFF data evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Technology
  • Quantitative MRI

Background:

  • Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) is a key MRI/MRS metric for quantifying fat content.
  • Robustness of PDFF measurements is crucial for accurate clinical and research applications.
  • Current methods may lack detailed spatial error assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the robustness of PDFF data derived from MRI/MRS.
  • To implement a spatially resolved error estimation technique for PDFF analysis.
  • To validate the error estimation method using both ex vivo and in vivo mouse liver data.

Main Methods:

  • Acquisition of in vivo and ex vivo MRI/MRS data on a 7T small animal scanner.
  • Calculation of PDFF maps using a magnitude-based approach with 24 echo times.
  • Pixel-wise error estimation performed via propagation of uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • Error maps successfully identified measurement errors as a cause for unexpected PDFF variations in explanted liver.
  • In vivo error maps raised concerns about PDFF data quality, leading to identification of motion and bladder filling as error sources.
  • The method demonstrated utility in distinguishing true biological variations from measurement artifacts.

Conclusions:

  • Combining pixel-wise PDFF data with corresponding error maps enhances the specificity and spatial resolution of reliability evaluation.
  • This approach provides a more reliable assessment of PDFF value accuracy.
  • Spatially resolved error estimation is vital for robust quantitative MRI/MRS analysis.

Related Concept Videos