Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
- Chu Luan Nguyen 1,2, David Tovmassian 1,2, Anna Isaacs 1,2, Gregory L Falk 1,2,3
- Chu Luan Nguyen 1,2, David Tovmassian 1,2, Anna Isaacs 1,2
- 1Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia.
- 2Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
- 3Sydney Heartburn Clinic, Lindfield, NSW, Australia.
- 0Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia.
|
February 23, 2024
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Accurate identification of lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk in early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is crucial. T1a EAC has a 4.2% LNM rate, while T1b EAC has a 23.2% rate, guiding treatment decisions.
Area Of Science
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
- Pathology
Background
- Early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) management increasingly utilizes endoscopic resection.
- Endoscopic resection cannot accurately stage or treat lymph node metastasis (LNM).
- Accurate LNM identification is critical for selecting between endoscopic therapy and surgery.
Purpose Of The Study
- To define the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).
- To identify risk factors associated with LNM in T1 EAC.
- To stratify LNM risk within T1b submucosal (SM) disease stages.
Main Methods
- A meta-analysis was conducted on studies of T1 EAC patients who underwent surgery and lymphadenectomy.
- PRISMA guidelines were followed for study selection and data extraction.
- Main outcomes included the probability of LNM in T1a and T1b disease, with secondary outcomes focusing on risk factors and SM disease stratification.
Main Results
- Twenty cohort studies involving 2264 patients met inclusion criteria.
- T1a EAC showed a 4.2% LNM rate (36/857 patients), while T1b EAC had a 23.2% LNM rate (327/1407 patients).
- T1 substage, tumor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were significant risk factors for LNM.
Conclusions
- Endoscopic therapy should be reserved for T1a EAC.
- Select T1b EAC cases may be candidates for endoscopic therapy, but the moderately high LNM rate requires careful consideration.
- Current data are insufficient to stratify T1b submucosal disease into low-risk and high-risk categories based on tumor differentiation and LVI.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

