Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

8.1K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
8.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.3K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.3K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

199
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
199

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dietary variability in Middle Holocene South American shellmounds: Insights from isotopic analysis and an adapted Bayesian MixSIAR model.

PloS one·2025
Same author

CYP3A5 and POR gene polymorphisms as predictors of infection and graft rejection in post-liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus - a cohort study.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2025
Same author

A Bayesian Approach for Modeling and Forecasting Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Adaptive Significance Levels in Tests for Linear Regression Models: The <i>e</i>-Value and <i>P</i>-Value Cases.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Cryptococcal Antigenemia in HIV-Infected Patients with CD4 < 200 Cells/µL in São Paulo, Brazil: A Bayesian Analysis

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Modeling Overdispersed Dengue Data via Poisson Inverse Gaussian Regression Model: A Case Study in the City of Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.6K

On the Nuisance Parameter Elimination Principle in Hypothesis Testing.

Andrés Felipe Flórez Rivera1, Luis Gustavo Esteves1, Victor Fossaluza1

  • 1Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle simplifies statistical inference with nuisance parameters. Mixed tests adhere to this principle in discrete spaces, easing hypothesis testing for count data.

Keywords:
Bayes factorhypothesis testinglikelihood functionp-values

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.6K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Statistical Inference
  • Hypothesis Testing

Background:

  • Nuisance parameters complicate statistical inference.
  • The Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle offers a framework for handling these parameters.
  • Hypothesis testing is a core statistical problem often affected by nuisance parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle in hypothesis testing.
  • To prove that mixed tests adhere to this principle for discrete sample spaces.
  • To demonstrate how this adherence simplifies test performance.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of the Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle.
  • Proof of adherence for mixed tests in discrete sample spaces.
  • Application to well-known problems in count data hypothesis testing.

Main Results:

  • The mixed test is proven to obey the Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle for discrete sample spaces.
  • Adherence to the principle simplifies the performance of mixed tests.
  • New solutions are provided for testing hypotheses with count data.

Conclusions:

  • The Non-Informative Nuisance Parameter Principle provides a valuable guideline for statistical inference.
  • Mixed tests are effective tools for hypothesis testing, especially with count data.
  • Simplifying test performance enhances the practical utility of statistical methods.