Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2026

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
Published on: October 2, 2017
The government and the inguinal hernia
Insights
Government policy denying elective hernia repair in children over one year old disproportionately harms low-income children. This increases risks of incarceration and complications, making the policy medically and economically unsound.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Health Economics
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- A governmental decision to disallow elective herniorrhaphy in children over 1 year of age.
- Socioeconomic disparities in healthcare access and outcomes.
- Concerns regarding incarceration and complications of inguinal hernias in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the incidence of inguinal hernias in children.
- To analyze socioeconomic differences in hernia incarceration risk.
- To evaluate the impact of disallowing elective herniorrhaphy on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on pediatric inguinal hernias.
- Analysis of incidence, incarceration rates, and complications.
- Comparison of outcomes based on socioeconomic status and insurance (e.g., Medicaid).
Main Results:
- The risk of incarceration, failed preoperative reduction, and potential gonadal injury is over three times higher in low-income children.
- Complications and hospitalization rates increase significantly with hernia incarceration.
- Denying elective repair endangers children's health and increases overall healthcare expenditure.
Conclusions:
- The governmental policy is medically and economically unsound.
- Disallowing elective herniorrhaphy in children over 1 year old poses significant risks.
- Healthcare cost-containment policies require careful scrutiny to avoid negative patient outcomes and societal costs.
Abstract:
Our review of the incidence of inguinal hernias in children based on socioeconomic differences and their risk of incarceration with its subsequent complications, was prompted by a governmental decision to disallow elective herniorrhaphy in children over 1 yr of age. The review showed the following: The risk of incarceration, the failure of preoperative reduction and the potential gonadal injury is more than three times as high in the poor child, usually covered by Medicaid. Since operative and postoperative complications increase proportional to the incidence of incarcertain, the denial of an elective herniorrhaphy endangers the life of a child. Since the increased hospitalization after incarceration also increases the financial expenditure, this rule is not only medically but also economically unsound. This review suggests that unilateral governmental health care decisions, especially those aimed at cost containment, should be carefully scrutinized to determine what price not only the society, but the patient has to pay for the "cost containment". We feel that the price of the denial of a herniorrhaphy is too high.
Related Concept Videos
Abdominal Regions and Quadrants
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four quadrants...
Muscles of the Pelvic Floor and Perineum
Perineal Layer
The perineum is a diamond-shaped area below the pelvic diaphragm, divided into an anterior urogenital triangle that contains the external genitals and a posterior anal triangle housing the anus. The urogenital...
Veins of the Abdomen and Pelvis
The inferior vena cava is fed by numerous smaller veins. The lumbar veins, for instance, drain the posterior abdominal wall, emptying both directly into the inferior vena cava and into the...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Herniated Intervertebral Disc l: Introduction
Hiatal Hernia

