Surgical management for penile fracture: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study

The objective of this study is to make an inventory of surgical practices and their consequences in the short and medium term on sexuality and micturition comfort.

It is a retrospective multicenter study over ten years on 63 men who had an operation for a fracture of the corpora cavernosa associated or not with a urethral lesion. Patient history, clinical presentation, surgical management as well as postoperative data were collected from operative reports. Residual penis curvature, IIEF5 score, IPSS score and residual pain were collected during a telephone interview during data collection.

No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for IIEF5, IPSS, sequelae curvature, pain during intercourse, time to resumption of sexual life, rate of surgical resumption between use of absorbable or non-absorbable threads and between the realization of an overlock or a separate point. We found a significant difference in the time taken to resume sexual activity, between surgical exploration by degloving compared to elective surgical exploration.

Our study shows great variability in the surgical management of penile fractures, with no influence in the short and medium term on sexuality and urination comfort. Medium-term complications such as erectile dysfunction, curvature of the penis and pain during sexual intercourse seem frequent and insufficiently diagnosed, but decrease during urological follow-up.