Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

13:19
Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
16.6K
Filamin A Is a Prognostic Serum Biomarker for Differentiating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia from Prostate Cancer in
Nischal Mahaveer Chand1, Poornima K Tekumalla1, Matt T Rosenberg2
1BPGbio Inc., Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Cancers
|February 24, 2024
Summary
Filamin A (FLNA) protein levels in serum can help distinguish benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) from aggressive prostate cancer in men. This biomarker shows promise in reducing unnecessary biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Oncology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Prostate cancer screening relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), but its utility is limited in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
- Elevated PSA in BPH can lead to unnecessary prostate biopsies, highlighting a need for improved diagnostic markers.
- Aggressive prostate cancer detection remains a challenge, particularly in differentiating it from BPH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of serum Filamin A (FLNA) fragment levels for differentiating BPH from aggressive prostate cancer.
- To compare the performance of FLNA as a biomarker against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in Caucasian (CA) and African American (AA) men.
- To establish FLNA as a standalone biomarker for improved prostate cancer diagnosis, reducing the need for prostate volume measurement.
Main Methods:
- Serum samples were collected from men with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL and negative digital rectal examination (DRE).
- Filamin A (FLNA) protein fragment levels were measured using IP-MRM mass spectrometry.
- Statistical analysis, including Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Odds Ratio (OR), was used to assess diagnostic utility in stratifying BPH from prostate cancer (Gleason score 7-10).
Main Results:
- In African American men, FLNA demonstrated diagnostic utility (0.71 AUC, 12.2 OR) outperforming PSA (0.50 AUC, 2.2 OR) in differentiating BPH from aggressive prostate cancer.
- In Caucasian men, FLNA also showed significant diagnostic utility (0.74 AUC, 19.4 OR), surpassing PSA's performance (0.46 AUC, 0.32 OR).
- FLNA alone proved effective in stratifying men with BPH versus those with high-grade prostate cancer, irrespective of prostate volume.
Conclusions:
- Serum FLNA levels serve as a clinically actionable biomarker for distinguishing benign prostatic hyperplasia from aggressive prostate cancer.
- FLNA offers improved diagnostic accuracy compared to PSA, particularly in diverse populations (AA and CA men).
- This biomarker has the potential to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies, improving patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

