Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
One-Year Outcomes of CGuard Double Mesh Stent in Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Konstantinos Tigkiropoulos1, Spyridon Nikas2, Manolis Ampatzis-Papadopoulos1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, 1st Surgical Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Insights
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the CGuard stent demonstrates safety and efficacy. This meta-analysis confirms low rates of death, stroke, and in-stent restenosis at one year for patients undergoing CAS with CGuard.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Previous studies indicated positive outcomes with the CGuard dual-layer mesh stent for carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- The CGuard stent is a novel device designed to improve patient outcomes in CAS procedures.
- Assessing long-term safety and efficacy is crucial for widespread adoption.
Conclusions:
- Carotid artery stenting with the CGuard stent is a safe procedure.
- The CGuard stent is associated with minimal neurological adverse events at 1 year.
- Low rates of in-stent restenosis were observed at 1 year, indicating device effectiveness.
Abstract:
Background: Prospective single and multicenter studies have shown improved outcomes of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting with the novel CGuard dual-layer mesh stent at 1 year. Objectives: The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies to assess 1-year efficacy and outcomes of CGuard in patients with carotid stenting. Methods: A systematic search was performed. All studies enrolling at least 20 patients were included in our analysis. The primary endpoints were death (all-cause, cardiovascular and ipsilateral stroke-related death) and stroke rate at 1 year. The secondary endpoint was in-stent restenosis at 1 year. Results: The final analysis included 1709 patients. The one-year all-cause mortality rate was 2.97% (39/1699, 95% CI: 1.26-6.86%, I2 = 67%, t2 = 0.3442, p < 0.01), cardiovascular-related death was 0.92% (10/1616, 95% CI: 0.35-2.39%, I2 = 34%, t2 = 0.2302, p = 0.18), and ipsilateral stroke-related death was 0.3% (1/1649, 95% CI: 0.1-0.87%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.69). The one-year ipsilateral stroke rate was 1.21% (16/1649, 95% CI: 0.58-2.5%, I2 = 28%, t2 = 0.1433, p = 0.23), transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) rate was 1.78% (19/1149, 95% CI: 1.11-2.84%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.69), and total composite 1-year stroke/TIA rate was 2.97% (32/1149, 95% CI: 1.84-4.77%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.41). The in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year was 1.06% (13/1653, 95% CI: 0.48-2.34%, I2 = 28%, t2 = 0.2308, p = 0.22). Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that CAS with CGuard is safe with minimal neurological adverse events and in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

