Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

06:22
Standardization of Transfer across Labs between Flow Cytometers for Detection of Lymphocytes in Japanese Encephalitis Vaccinated Children
Published on: February 10, 2023
992
Measuring Zero-Dose Children: Reflections on Age Cohort Flexibilities for Targeted Immunization Surveys at the Local
Gustavo C Corrêa1, Md Jasim Uddin2, Tasnuva Wahed2
1Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, Le Grand Saconnex, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland.
Vaccines
|February 24, 2024
Summary
Achieving zero-dose (ZD) vaccination coverage requires flexible measurement approaches. Including younger children in surveys provides timely data for immunization programs and identifies missed communities.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Immunization Programs
- Public Health Surveillance
Background:
- Zero-dose (ZD) children are a key global health objective, central to the Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030).
- Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP1) vaccine coverage is the standard indicator for ZD children, typically assessed via caregiver reports for children aged 12-23 months.
- Country-level needs may necessitate alternative ZD measurement strategies beyond the global definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss flexible age cohort inclusion in targeted surveys for ZD measurement.
- To explore how different age cohorts inform immunization timeliness, catch-up activities, and programmatic priorities.
- To enhance the utility of ZD data for rapid learning cycles and decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Summarized discussions from the Zero-Dose Learning Hub (ZDLH) initiative, involving multiple organizations across four countries.
- Considered practical aspects of age cohort selection, including sample size, recall bias, and data relevance.
- Evaluated the benefits of including the first year of life cohort in surveys.
Main Results:
- The ZDLH initiative recommended including the age cohort from 18 weeks to 23 months.
- This approach allows for disaggregation of results across two cohort years, aiding in identifying systematically missed communities.
- Flexibility in age cohort selection for local surveys is proposed as a key principle.
Conclusions:
- Including the first year of life cohort in surveys improves data utility for current program targets and rapid learning.
- Further research is needed to understand how improved DTP1 timeliness in the first year correlates with ZD outcomes in the 12-23 month cohort.
- Flexible age cohort inclusion in targeted surveys is crucial for effective local-level ZD measurement and program improvement.

