Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words
Sarah D Patrick1, Lisa J Rapport1, Robin A Hanks2
1Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Pupillometry can detect feigned cognitive impairment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) assessments. Specific pupillary dilation patterns, like dilation-response inconsistency, effectively differentiate genuine TBI from simulated impairment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Biometrics
Background:
- Pupillometry measures physiological and psychological states, including cognitive load, familiarity, and deception.
- These pupillary responses are involuntary and offer insights into an individual's cognitive processes.
- Performance validity testing (PVT) is crucial in neuropsychological evaluations, especially for traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate pupillary dilation patterns during a PVT in adults with genuine TBI and those feigning impairment.
- To determine if pupillometry can differentiate between true TBI and simulated cognitive deficits.
Main Methods:
- 214 adults participated: 51 with TBI, 72 healthy controls (HC), and 91 simulating TBI (SIM).
- Pupillary dilation indices (PD-Baseline, PD-Range) and a pupillary-behavioral index (Dilation-Response Inconsistency - DRI) were evaluated during a PVT.
- The Recognition Memory Test (RMT) was administered as part of a neuropsychological battery.
Main Results:
- All three pupillary indices significantly differed among groups (TBI, HC, SIM) with medium-to-large effect sizes.
- PD-Baseline was lower in the TBI group, indicating oculomotor dysfunction.
- PD-Range showed SIM > TBI > HC, suggesting differential dynamic engagement.
- DRI was significantly higher in simulators (SIM) compared to other groups, particularly distinguishing simulators with invalid RMT scores from TBI patients with invalid scores.
Conclusions:
- Pupillometry shows promise as a biometric tool for performance validity assessment in TBI evaluations.
- The findings support further research into using pupillary indices in multimethod assessments of performance validity.
- Pupillary measures, especially DRI, can aid in identifying feigned cognitive impairment.
More Related Videos
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017