AI and the nature of disagreement
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Artificial intelligence (AI) can aid in resolving legal disputes by clarifying misunderstandings of law. However, AI
Area Of Science
- Legal Technology
- Computational Law
- Artificial Intelligence in Law
Background
- Litigation inherently involves disagreements over facts, law, or their application.
- The source of legal disagreement influences the potential for resolution.
- Understanding these sources is crucial for assessing dispute resolution tools.
Purpose Of The Study
- To explore the capacity of artificial intelligence (AI) to mitigate legal disagreements.
- To analyze how the nature of disputes affects AI's effectiveness in resolution.
- To identify the limitations of AI in addressing complex legal conflicts.
Main Methods
- Conceptual analysis of AI capabilities in legal contexts.
- Examination of AI's strengths in clarifying legal principles versus factual disputes.
- Discussion of AI's limitations with private data and rule selection disagreements.
Main Results
- AI effectively clarifies disagreements concerning the application of law to facts.
- AI's utility is limited in disputes centered on factual evidence due to data privacy.
- AI may be insufficient for resolving disagreements over governing legal rules.
Conclusions
- AI offers potential for reducing certain types of legal disagreements, particularly those involving legal interpretation.
- The effectiveness of AI in dispute resolution is contingent on the nature and source of the disagreement.
- Further research is needed to address AI's limitations in fact-centric and rule-selection disputes.
Related Concept Videos
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
When drugs are administered, they can elicit either an agonist or antagonist effect on the body. Agonism occurs when a drug activates a specific receptor, triggering a biological response. On the other hand, antagonism happens when a drug binds to the same receptors but blocks their activation, thereby preventing a biological response.
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
A group that we don’t belong to, an out-group, is a group that we view as fundamentally different from us. For example, if you are female, your gender in-group includes all females, and your gender out-group...
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

