Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

4.8K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
4.8K
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition02:11

The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition

35.4K
Plants have the impressive ability to create their own food through photosynthesis. However, plants often require assistance from organisms in the soil to acquire the nutrients they need to function correctly. Both bacteria and fungi have evolved symbiotic relationships with plants that help the species to thrive in a wide variety of environments.
35.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Top-Down Coercive Mechanisms and the Major Transitions in Evolution.

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2025
Same author

Updating the Discontinuity Theory to the Extended Immunity: The Symmunobiome Concept.

European journal of immunology·2025
Same author

Health-promoting worms? Prospects and pitfalls of helminth therapy.

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2024
Same author

Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions.

Materials horizons·2024
Same author

Scrutinizing microbiome determinism: why deterministic hypotheses about the microbiome are conceptually ungrounded.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2024
Same author

Descriptive understanding and prediction in COVID-19 modelling.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

12.9K

Epistemic misalignments in microbiome research.

Federico Boem1, Javier Suárez2

  • 1Philosophy Section, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Bioessays : News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology
|February 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microbiome research faces "epistemic misalignment" when methods like 16S rRNA sequencing don't match scientific questions about microbial function, potentially undermining field credibility.

Keywords:
microbiomemisalignmentscientific methodology

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.0K
Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy
07:00

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: October 4, 2024

590

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

12.9K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.0K
Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy
07:00

Microbiota of Attine Ants' Gardens: Visualizing a Microbial Landscape by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: October 4, 2024

590

Area of Science:

  • Microbiome research
  • Scientific methodology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Contemporary microbiome science relies on various methods to generate datasets.
  • The choice of methodology can inadvertently introduce biases or limitations.
  • Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate scientific interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define the concept of "epistemic misalignment" in microbiome research.
  • To highlight the potential risks of epistemic misalignment to the credibility of microbiome science.
  • To urge researchers to critically evaluate their chosen methods in relation to their research questions.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of research methodologies in microbiome science.
  • Identification of potential epistemic misalignments, using 16S rRNA sequencing as a case study.
  • Examination of the temporal scales of data acquisition versus functional requirements.

Main Results:

  • Epistemic misalignment occurs when a method's constraints prevent it from accurately addressing a scientific question.
  • 16S rRNA sequencing may lead to epistemic misalignment when investigating microbial function due to mismatched temporal scales.
  • Examples of epistemic misalignment are present in current microbiome research.

Conclusions:

  • Microbiome researchers must critically assess their methods to avoid epistemic misalignment.
  • Addressing methodological limitations is essential for maintaining the integrity and credibility of microbiome science.
  • Adopting more appropriate methods will lead to more robust and reliable microbiome data.