Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Experimental Endocarditis Model of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA in Rat
Published on: June 4, 2012
Modeling relaxed policies for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions
Jiaming Cui1, Jack Heavey2, Leo Lin2
1College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Objective:
To evaluate the economic costs of reducing the University of Virginia Hospital's present "3-negative" policy, which continues methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contact precautions until patients receive 3 consecutive negative test results, to either 2 or 1 negative.
Design:
Cost-effective analysis.
Settings:
The University of Virginia Hospital.
Patients:
The study included data from 41,216 patients from 2015 to 2019.
Methods:
We developed a model for MRSA transmission in the University of Virginia Hospital, accounting for both environmental contamination and interactions between patients and providers, which were derived from electronic health record (EHR) data. The model was fit to MRSA incidence over the study period under the current 3-negative clearance policy. A counterfactual simulation was used to estimate outcomes and costs for 2- and 1-negative policies compared with the current 3-negative policy.
Results:
Our findings suggest that 2-negative and 1-negative policies would have led to 6 (95% CI, -30 to 44; P < .001) and 17 (95% CI, -23 to 59; -10.1% to 25.8%; P < .001) more MRSA cases, respectively, at the hospital over the study period. Overall, the 1-negative policy has statistically significantly lower costs ($628,452; 95% CI, $513,592-$752,148) annually (P < .001) in US dollars, inflation-adjusted for 2023) than the 2-negative policy ($687,946; 95% CI, $562,522-$812,662) and 3-negative ($702,823; 95% CI, $577,277-$846,605).
Conclusions:
A single negative MRSA nares PCR test may provide sufficient evidence to discontinue MRSA contact precautions, and it may be the most cost-effective option.
Insights
Reducing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contact precautions to one negative test result significantly lowers hospital costs. A single negative MRSA test may be the most cost-effective strategy for discontinuing precautions.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Health Economics
- Hospital Infection Control
Background:
- The University of Virginia Hospital currently employs a "3-negative" policy for discontinuing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contact precautions.
- This policy requires three consecutive negative test results before contact precautions are lifted.
- Evaluating alternative policies with fewer negative tests is crucial for optimizing patient care and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the economic costs associated with reducing the MRSA "3-negative" policy to either a "2-negative" or "1-negative" policy.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of different MRSA clearance strategies at the University of Virginia Hospital.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using data from 41,216 patients between 2015 and 2019.
- A mathematical model simulating MRSA transmission, incorporating environmental and patient-provider interactions, was developed using electronic health record data.
- Counterfactual simulations compared the existing 3-negative policy with hypothetical 2-negative and 1-negative policies.
Main Results:
- The 2-negative and 1-negative policies were projected to result in 6 and 17 additional MRSA cases, respectively, compared to the 3-negative policy.
- The 1-negative policy demonstrated statistically significant annual cost savings of $628,452 compared to the 2-negative policy ($687,946) and the 3-negative policy ($702,823).
- These cost savings are inflation-adjusted for 2023.
Conclusions:
- A single negative MRSA nares PCR test may be sufficient to discontinue contact precautions.
- The 1-negative policy appears to be the most cost-effective strategy for managing MRSA in this hospital setting.
- Implementing a 1-negative policy could lead to substantial cost reductions while managing MRSA transmission.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...

