ADCOMS sensitivity versus baseline diagnosis and progression phenotypes
Dave Evenden1, Angus Prosser1, Sofia Michopoulou1,2
1Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
Background:
The Alzheimer's Disease COMposite Score (ADCOMS) is more sensitive in clinical trials than conventional measures when assessing pre-dementia. This study compares ADCOMS trajectories using clustered progression characteristics to better understand different patterns of decline.
Methods:
Post-baseline ADCOMS values were analyzed for sensitivity using mean-to-standard deviation ratio (MSDR), partitioned by baseline diagnosis, comparing with the original scales upon which ADCOMS is based. Because baseline diagnosis was not a particularly reliable predictor of progression, individuals were also grouped into similar ADCOMS progression trajectories using clustering methods and the MSDR compared for each progression group.
Results:
ADCOMS demonstrated increased sensitivity for clinically important progression groups. ADCOMS did not show statistically significant sensitivity or clinical relevance for the less-severe baseline diagnoses and marginal progression groups.
Conclusions:
This analysis complements and extends previous work validating the sensitivity of ADCOMS. The large data set permitted evaluation-in a novel approach-by the clustered progression group.
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...


