Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025
Substernal Thyroid Biopsy Using Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Published on: November 10, 2014
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial miniforceps biopsy an urban center experience
Moayad Al Sona1, Oshioke Esivue1, Sadia Benzaquen1
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background:
The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in staging mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established. However, evidence of its diagnostic utility in other pathologies-such as lymphoma-remains inadequate. This retrospective observational study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) compared to EBUS-TBNA in both malignant and nonmalignant conditions.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of all adult patients referred for EBUS at our institution between January 2019 and December 2022. All patients who underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-MFB were included, with some patients also undergoing transbronchial cryobiopsy. Patients without pathology reports available were excluded.
Results:
The combination of EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA had the highest percentage of diagnostic results both in the overall cohort (34.4%) and in patients who did not undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy (46.2%). EBUS-MFB alone yielded more diagnostic results compared to EBUS-TBNA. Transbronchial cryobiopsy was the sampling method with the highest percentage of diagnostic results in the cryobiopsy group (64.5%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield between EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA (P<0.001), with EBUS-MFB showing a higher diagnostic yield overall. EBUS-MFB had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than EBUS-TBNA in benign cases, in patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, but not in malignant disease.
Conclusions:
Our study suggests that combining EBUS-MFB with EBUS-TBNA can improve the diagnostic yield, particularly in benign cases and sarcoidosis. These findings support the potential superiority of adding EBUS-MFB over EBUS-TBNA alone and highlight the need for further randomized control trials to validate these results. The retrospective nature of this study and certain limitations, such as the lack of adequate longer-term follow-up, selection and operator biases, and the absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in some cases, should be considered when interpreting the results. Nonetheless, this study contributes to the growing evidence for the utility of EBUS-MFB in improving the diagnostic yield of EBUS procedures in specific clinical scenarios.
