Understanding gender inequity in brain health outcomes: missed stroke as a case study for intersectionality
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Misdiagnosis in stroke highlights the "brain health gap." Understanding gender-based disparities requires examining how social identities intersect to influence stroke care access and outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Sociology of Health
Background
- Growing awareness of sex and gender inequities in brain health disorders.
- The concept of a
- brain health gap
- highlights disparities in care.
- Women are not a monolithic demographic group, necessitating nuanced analysis.
Purpose Of The Study
- To examine misdiagnosis in stroke as a facet of access and quality of care within brain health.
- To explore how intersecting social identities influence gender-based gaps in stroke care.
- To understand the complex factors contributing to stroke outcomes.
Main Methods
- Perspective piece drawing on narrative data.
- Mixed methods study of young stroke survivors.
- Analysis of intersecting social identities (gender, age, ethnoracial identity, nationality, language, disability).
Main Results
- Missed stroke is not solely a gender issue.
- Intersections of gender with other social identities create both opportunities and biases in stroke care.
- These intersections significantly impact access and navigation through stroke care pathways.
Conclusions
- Addressing the "brain health gap" requires understanding the multifaceted nature of gender and its intersections with other social determinants of health.
- A nuanced approach is essential to identify and rectify gender-based inequities in stroke diagnosis and care.
- Future research should focus on the complex interplay of social factors to improve stroke outcomes for all individuals.

