Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary
Stefano Garzon1, Felipe Bezerra, José Mariani
1Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) demonstrated superior outcomes compared to rotational atherectomy (RA) for heavily calcified coronary lesions. IVL achieved optimal stent implantation more frequently, leading to larger final lumen areas and improved patient results.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for heavily calcified lesions present significant technical challenges and are linked to poorer prognoses.
- Effective lesion preparation is crucial for minimizing complications and enhancing outcomes in PCI procedures.
- Rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) are key techniques for preparing calcified coronary arteries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of rotational atherectomy (RA) versus intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in achieving optimal stent implantation.
- To evaluate stent implantation success using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria in heavily calcified coronary lesions.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, single-center study involving patients who underwent PCI for heavily calcified coronary lesions.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients treated with RA and those treated with IVL.
- Assessment of stent implantation success based on pre-established intravascular ultrasound criteria.
Main Results:
- The intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) group achieved a significantly larger final minimal lumen area (7.6 mm² vs. 5.4 mm²; P=0.01) and lumen area gain (4.1 mm² vs. 2.3 mm²; P=0.01).
- 100% of patients in the IVL group met the criteria for successful stent implantation, compared to 69.2% in the rotational atherectomy (RA) group (P=0.04).
- The final stent volume was also significantly larger in the IVL group (491.2 mm³ vs. 326.2 mm³; P=0.03).
Conclusions:
- Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) facilitates a higher rate of successful stent implantation in heavily calcified coronary lesions compared to rotational atherectomy (RA).
- IVL treatment resulted in superior angiographic outcomes, including larger lumen dimensions post-intervention.
- These findings suggest IVL is a more effective modality for lesion preparation in complex PCI cases.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management