Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025
06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.1K
Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games.
Guangrong Wang1,2, Jianbiao Li2,3, Wenhua Wang2,3
1Neural Decision Science Laboratory, School of Economics and Management, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China.
Summary
In public goods games, confusion does not drive cooperation. Social preferences, not confusion, significantly influence contributions when playing with humans, validating economic experiment assumptions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Game Theory
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Previous research suggested confusion, not motivation, drives cooperation in public goods games.
- This challenges the assumption that choices in experiments reflect underlying motivations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of confusion versus social preferences in public goods game contributions.
- To test the validity of the assumption that choices reveal motivations in behavioral economics experiments.
Main Methods:
- Conducted two experiments minimizing participant confusion through enhanced training.
- Included a specific question to assess understanding of payoff maximization.
- Compared behavior when participants played against computers versus humans.
Main Results:
- Behavioral patterns significantly differed between computer and human opponents.
- Contributions increased significantly when participants played against humans.
- Social norms appeared to be the primary driver for contributions when playing against computers.
Conclusions:
- Social preferences, rather than confusion, are key determinants of contributions in public goods games with human opponents.
- The assumption that choices in behavioral economics experiments reflect motivations is supported.
Related Concept Videos
00:57Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
01:04Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
01:20Conformity
45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
80
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
80