Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Perceptions of Justice in Clinical Learning Environments: Development and Validation of an Organizational Justice
Michael J Cullen1, Jessica Hane2, You Zhou3
1M.J. Cullen is senior director of assessment, evaluation, and research for graduate medical education, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Purpose:
This study aimed to develop an instrument to measure medical trainees' perceptions of justice in clinical learning environments.
Method:
Between 2019 and 2023, the authors conducted a multiyear, multi-institutional, multiphase study to develop a 16-item justice measure with 4 dimensions: interpersonal, informational, procedural, and distributive. The authors gathered validity evidence based on test content, internal structure, and relationships with other variables across 3 phases. Phase 1 involved drafting items and gathering evidence that items measured intended dimensions. Phase 2 involved analyzing relevance of items for target groups, examining interitem correlations and factor loadings in a preliminary analysis, and obtaining reliability estimates. Phase 3 involved a confirmatory factor analysis and collecting convergent and discriminant validity evidence.
Results:
In phase 1, 63 of 91 draft items were retained following a content validation exercise gauging how well items measured targeted dimensions (mean [SD] item ratings within dimensions, 4.16 [0.36] to 4.39 [0.34]) on a 5-point Likert scale (with 1 indicating not at all well and 5 indicating extremely well). In phase 2, 30 items were removed due to low factor loadings (i.e., < 0.40), and 4 items per dimension were selected (factor loadings, 0.42-0.89). In phase 3, a confirmatory factor analysis supported the 4-dimensional model ( χ2 = 610.14, P < .001; comparative fit index = 0.90, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.87, root mean squared error of approximation = 0.11, standardized root mean squared residual = 0.06), with convergent and discriminant validity evidence showing hypothesized positive correlations with a justice measure ( r = 0.93, P < .001), trait positive affect ( r = 0.46, P < .001), and emotional stability ( r = 0.33, P < .001) and negative correlations with trait negative affect ( r = -0.39, P < .001).
Conclusions:
Results indicate the measure's potential utility in understanding justice perceptions and designing targeted interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...

