Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025
Hippocampal Neuronal Cultures to Detect and Study New Pathogenic Antibodies Involved in Autoimmune Encephalitis
Published on: June 2, 2022
Performance of assessment tools in predicting neural autoantibody positivity in patients with seizures
Wei Peng1, Minjin Wang2, Wenyan Shi1
1Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Background:
The identification of patients with seizures of unknown etiology who would benefit from neural antibody testing necessitates effective assessment tools. The study aimed to compare the performance of the Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2) score and the "Obvious" Indications for Neural Antibody Testing in Epilepsy or Seizures (ONES) checklist. We also intended to evaluate whether the performance of the tools varied by types of antibody.
Methods:
Patients diagnosed with epilepsy, seizures, or status epilepticus of unknown etiology at West China Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were included. Paired serum/cerebrospinal fluid samples were analyzed for antineuronal and antiglial antibodies. The APE2 score and ONES checklist were applied, and their outcomes were compared to laboratory antibody test results. Possible false positive neuronal antibody results were excluded in sensitivity/specificity analysis reasonably.
Results:
A total of 113 antibody-positive and 159 antibody-negative patients were enrolled in sensitivity/specificity analysis. The ONES checklist showed superior sensitivity than APE2 score (95.6 % vs.79.6 %, P < 0.001). Specificity was not statistically different (60.4 % vs. 57.9 %, P = 0.557). The negative predictive value (NPV) of ONES checklist was higher than that of APE2 score (94.8 % vs 80.7 %, P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of them was not statistically different (61.7 % vs 58.8 %, P = 0.557). APE2 score exhibited lower sensitivity for predicting LGI-Abs (52.9 % vs. 80.3 %, P = 0.022) compared to NMDAR-Abs. Similarly, ONES checklist showed lower sensitivity for LGI1-Abs than NMDAR-Abs (82.4 % vs. 100.0 %, P = 0.009).
Conclusions:
The ONES checklist demonstrates superior sensitivity for neural antibody positivity than APE2 score. Specificity of the two assessment tools was similar. ONES checklist performed better NPV than the APE2 score. Both assessment tools performed less well in predicting the presence of LGI1- Abs when compared to NMDAR-Abs.
More Related Videos
07:20A Simple Cell-based Immunofluorescence Assay to Detect Autoantibody Against the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate NMDA Receptor in Blood
Published on: January 9, 2018
10:19High-throughput Flow Cytometry Cell-based Assay to Detect Antibodies to N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor or Dopamine-2 Receptor in Human Serum
Published on: November 23, 2013
