Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Quantitative Atomic-Site Analysis of Functional Dopants/Point Defects in Crystalline Materials by Electron-Channeling-Enhanced Microanalysis
Published on: May 10, 2021
X-rays, electrons, and neutrons as probes of atomic matter
1IIMCB, Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland; Polish Academy of Sciences, IBB, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract:
X-rays, electrons, and neutrons probe different properties of matter. X-rays feel electron density (ED). Electrons sense the electrostatic potential (ESP) of electrons and nuclei. Neutrons are sensitive to nuclear coherent scattering length (NCSL). While NCSL maps are widely understood to be different, ED and ESP maps are tacitly assumed to be similar. Here, I show that the belief in ED and ESP map equivalence is mistaken, but contains a grain of truth. Using density functional theory (DFT), the Bethe-Mott (BM) relation, and the Thomas-Fermi (TF) and Cromer-Mann (CM) atomic models, I show that ED and ESP maps are indeed more similar to each other than to NCSL maps. Nevertheless, peak and integrated map values depend differently on the atomic order number and on the contributions from electrons in the inner and outer CM shells. ED and ESP maps also differ in the sign and relative magnitude of excess charge effects.
More Related Videos
14:53In Situ Detection and Single Cell Quantification of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Nuclear Microprobe Analysis
Published on: February 3, 2018
11:27Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2
Published on: December 8, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Microscopy Techniques
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Atomic Structure
X-ray Imaging
Subatomic Particles
The de Broglie Wavelength