The apparent loss of PRC2 chromatin occupancy as an artifact of RNA depletion

Evan Healy1, Qi Zhang2, Emma H Gail1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Cell Reports
|February 28, 2024
PubMed

Insights

RNase A treatment during ChIP assays can distort results by altering DNA representation, invalidating prior conclusions about RNA

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Epigenetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • RNA's role in recruiting chromatin modifiers is debated.
  • RNase treatment is used to study RNA-mediated regulation, but its limitations are unclear.
  • RNase A treatment in ChIP assays suggested an RNA bridge between Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and chromatin.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the limitations of RNase A treatment in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays.
  • To re-evaluate the role of RNA in Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) chromatin occupancy.

Main Methods:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays with and without RNase A treatment.
  • Genome-wide analysis of H3K27me3 and PRC2 occupancy.
  • DNA sequencing and analysis of targeted and non-targeted chromatin regions.

Main Results:

  • RNase A treatment during ChIP caused an apparent genome-wide loss of facultative heterochromatin, including PRC2 and H3K27me3.
  • This apparent loss resulted from a gain of DNA from non-targeted chromatin, not a true loss of heterochromatin.
  • The study identified a significant bias in DNA sequencing due to RNase A treatment.

Conclusions:

  • RNase A treatment during ChIP assays has substantial limitations for mapping RNA-dependent chromatin occupancy.
  • Previous conclusions regarding PRC2's RNA-dependent chromatin association, based on RNase A treatment, are invalidated.
  • The study highlights the need for careful consideration of enzymatic treatments in epigenetic studies.