Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Use of win time for ordered composite endpoints in clinical trials.
James F Troendle1, Eric S Leifer1, Song Yang1
1Office of Biostatistics Research, Division of Intramural Research of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
New clinical trial methods, including variants of the win ratio, better capture overall treatment benefit from a patient
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Survival Analysis
Background:
- Clinical trials often assess treatment benefit by analyzing time-to-first-event data.
- Existing methods like the ordinary win ratio may not fully capture the patient's overall treatment experience.
- There is a need for statistical approaches that provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment benefit and harm.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate novel variants of the win ratio for clinical trials measuring multiple clinical events.
- To develop methods that better reflect the patient's perspective on overall treatment benefit and harm.
- To compare the performance of these new methods against existing approaches like the composite event and ordinary win ratio.
Main Methods:
- Development of several new win ratio variants incorporating time spent in clinical states.
- One variant prioritizes death while accounting for time in other states.
- Other variants include average pairwise win time, expected win times (EWTs) against a reference distribution, and methods using estimated clinical state distributions.
- A combination testing approach is proposed for robust power across various scenarios.
- Methods were compared using simulations and re-analysis of a heart failure trial.
Main Results:
- Simulations indicate that variants based on expected win times (EWTs) or estimated clinical state distributions offer substantially higher power when treatment benefit on death is significant.
- These novel methods demonstrated superior performance compared to pairwise comparison or composite event methods in specific scenarios.
- The methods provide a more nuanced evaluation of treatment effects, aligning better with patient-centered outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The proposed win ratio variants and combination testing approach offer improved statistical power and a more patient-relevant assessment of treatment benefit in clinical trials.
- Methods incorporating time spent in clinical states, particularly EWTs and estimated state distributions, are effective for detecting treatment benefits, especially concerning mortality.
- These advanced statistical tools enhance the interpretation of clinical trial results for guiding therapeutic decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

